
dkhdjdbr
why are tulpas not problematic?/genq
I can't speak for the term tulpa (at the moment I need to do more research onto its origins and such, I'm personally conflicted with it), but I can speak for tulpas, the created headmates. There are several reasons for this-
First, when you create a tulpa, that practice in of itself is not problematic. Tulpas function more like imaginary friends, only unlike imaginary friends are generally treated as individuals. Thus, you have cases where not only people accidentally create tulpas, they accidentally figure out possession and switching all on their own. It doesn't make sense to say that tulpa systems are somehow mocking DID systems when tulpas can exist independent of that.
Second, those who may think they have DID but actually don't can still have legitimate headmates. It's really common to hear stories about people thinking they might have DID or self-dxing, and it's debatable if you can "give yourself" DID. However, you can give yourself tulpas by creating them or even by pretending to have tulpas! At its core, tulpamancy is about convincing yourself you have people in your head, and if that involves confusing it for DID, it can still work.
Third, it is possible to have a mixed system or a system that starts off endogenic but later develops traumatic plurality. I have seen cases where a system starts with creating tulpas, and then later figures out they have alters in addition to their tulpas. Their tulpas are not fake, in fact they function like alters given their mental health situation. Additionally, some systems can start out as tulpa systems and get worse over time. It's very rare, but I have seen a tulpa system with trauma grow more dysfunctional over time and struggle with in-system dynamics and gain new headmates that have trauma-related origins. It doesn't make sense to say that their tulpas "became real" later, or that their tulpas are somehow "more real" when non-traumatic systems can create tulpas doing the same thing